Business / &Amp;#8216;Hdi Is A Composite Index That Is A Far Better Representative Indicator Of Economic Development Than Gnp Per Capita.&Amp;#8217; Discuss

&Amp;#8216;Hdi Is A Composite Index That Is A Far Better Representative Indicator Of Economic Development Than Gnp Per Capita.&Amp;#8217; Discuss

This essay &Amp;#8216;Hdi Is A Composite Index That Is A Far Better Representative Indicator Of Economic Development Than Gnp Per Capita.&Amp;#8217; Discuss is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.

Autor:  anton  30 December 2010
Tags:  8216hdi,  Composite,  Better,  Representative
Words: 1754   |   Pages: 8
Views: 845

Studying development is essentially about measuring how developed one country is compared to other countries or to the same country in the past. It is common knowledge that each country is aiming to be defined as developed. For us is to determine which measure is a better representative of how country is developed HDI or GNP per capita.

Firstly, we will define what economic development is. Secondly we will compare Gross National Product and Gross Domestic Product. Thirdly, we will outline the problems with these indicators. Finally, we will try to find out whether HDI is a solution to the problems identified in GNP/GDP.

What is economic development?

As the definition states economic development is a “sustainable increase in living standards that implies increased per capita income, better education and health as well as environmental protection.” In Process of Economic Development (J.M. Cypher and J.L. Dietz) defines two different ways of measuring economic growth and development. First is the income per person/economic growth (GNP/GDP) and second which describes development as a “complex, multi-faced notion” and that it should be captured by broader means than income like for example HDI. Others differ the ways of measuring development by dividing it to economic development and human development. Where economic development is a measure of how wealthy a country is - and of how this wealth is generated and human development measures the extent to which people have access to wealth, jobs, knowledge, nutrition, health, leisure and safety.

However before we focus on defining both indicators we need to see what is meant by development. Dictionaries state that it is an act of improving by expanding, enlarging or refining. Also it can be a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage). The last but not the least is that it is a state in which things are improving and that kind of development is of our interest.

Gross National Product (GNP) vs. Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

After discussing what is development alone let us focus on the indicators which define how countries are developed. First discussed by us will be Gross National Product. GNP is the total value of all final goods and services produced by a country's factors of production and sold on the market in a given time period. The difference between GDP is that the income can be derived from sources within (like GDP) or outside the country’s borders. The values differ because none of today’s world economies is so hermetic to the rest of the world that it would not derive any income outside its boundaries. Hermetic in the sense that there are no flows of investment between country and migration of workers.

Let us show it on an example. If “A” has foreign direct investments (FDI) outside “A”, and “A” loans money from its banks to “B”, than flow of profits, dividends or interest this income will be a part of “A” GNP but not GDP. On the other hand aforementioned FDI of “B” in “A” will create income within “A” borders and therefore would be included in “A” GDP. Though not all that income will be “A” GNP.

Next type of income flow between “A” and “B” that can result in differences between GDP and GNP is due to abovementioned migration of work forces. We can argue that as they work outside the borders none of their income would be part of “A” GDP. However they often leave their families inside the “A” borders and as the way of supporting them they send a portion of their income within “A” frontier.

As a real example we may quote the figures for Ireland. The GDP in 2005 was €161,163m and the GNP just €135,914m (World Bank). This was calculated in nominal GNP which measures the value of output during a given year using the prices prevailing during that year. Over time, the general levels of prices rise due to inflation, leading to an increase in nominal GNP even if the volume of goods and services produced is unchanged. On the other hand we have real GNP which measures the value of output in two or more different years by valuing the goods and services adjusted for inflation.

Problems with GNP/GDP

GNP is merely a gross measure of market activity which counts only money transactions and excludes goods and services (like taking care, cleaning, food preparation) that people provide each other free. In terms of developed economies like United Kingdom it would not be a huge difference, however in less developed countries much of its production takes place in the household economy like growing crops and farming animals for the purpose of the household not selling. Therefore it would not be included in countries GNP/GDP.

The World Bank itself recognizes many of these problems. Although they reflect the average incomes in a country, GNP per capita and GDP per capita have numerous limitations when it comes to measuring people’s actual well-being. Taking as example countries which dig oil, where sheikhs earn millions and other live in poverty, the GNP per capita will count them equal dividing their income and not showing how equitably income is distributed.

They do not account for pollution, environmental degradation, and resource depletion. As a result of the problems outlined above, much of GDP can be composed of: fixing mistakes and social failures from the past borrowing resources from the future, and shifting functions from the traditional household and community to the monetary economy.

World Bank acknowledges that history offers a number of examples where economic growth was not followed by similar progress in human development and growth was achieved at the cost of greater inequity, higher unemployment, weakened democracy, loss of cultural identity, or over-consumption of resources needed by future generations.

Just as there are states that have not benefited from economic growth, there are also states, like Kerala, a state in India, which have raised the standard of living without economic growth. (http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/mm0795.08.html) The GDP per capita in Kerala is about $1,000 a year, around $200 less than the Indian average. However, despite low per capita incomes, Kerala’s 31 million people have achieved nearly total literacy, long life expectancy, low infant mortality and birth rates, and high access to medical care. Life expectancy in Kerala is 72 years, which is closer to the American average of 76 than to the Indian average of 61 and the infant-mortality rate in Kerala is among the lowest in the developing world.

Is HDI a solution?

As Human Development Report states each year development is about much more than the rise or fall of national incomes. It is about creating an environment in which people can develop their full potential and lead productive, creative lives in accord with their needs and interests. People are the real wealth of nations. Development is thus about expanding the choices people have to lead lives that they value. And it is thus about much more than economic growth, which is only a means —if a very important one —of enlarging people’s choices.

A solution to above stated problems comes in the form of the Human Development Index (HDI) a simple average of three indexes reflecting a country’s achievements in health and longevity (as measured by life expectancy at birth), education (measured by adult literacy and combined primary, secondary, and tertiary enrolments), and living standard (measured by GDP per capita in purchasing power parity terms). In this way, composite indices still provide a single number for easy comparison between states but include more information than simple GDP per capita.

It is common knowledge that water is essential for all of us to live GNP/GDP will not measure the fact that the world’s poorest people are paying some of the world’s highest prices for water. It will also rank Cuba with HDI 0.826 closer to Zimbabwe HDI 0.491 than Qatar HDI 0.844 as the GDP of Cuba is ~3.900$ per capita in comparison to Zimbabwe ~2.060$ and ~19.900$ in Qatar. The HDI vary between 0-1. Closer to 1 better level of human development. HDI is a deprivation index.

From the above real life example we may see that HDI is broader than the simple income per person indicator. At the same time, the HDI also gives direct value to e.g. education, which helps create opportunities for individuals to reach a higher and more fulfilling standard of living that may not be captured by the income measure alone.

However HDI is also not so perfect. National-level index is just an advocacy tool for international comparisons. In order to use HDI for policy-making purposes it needs to be desegregated. As a composite index it provides “suggestions for action” – could outline specific territorial units’ problems and priorities. In real terms it is not about the ranking but about the way the unit has reached its HDI value.

That is way there are some adjustments to the HDI like the Gender-related development index (GDI) which takes into account differences in the level of attainment of woman and men on the values of the indicators that enter the HDI. It shows that in no country do women, on average, score higher than or equal to men on the HDI components. GDI gives us some indication of the success of countries in achieving gender equity.

Another helpful index is the Human Poverty index which indicates what is happening to the poorest members of society. It is similar to HDI however it differs to other indexes as it is rather a deprivation indicator than achievement indicator. The information that we may achieve is that out of 643 million people who live in Sub-Saharan African, 480 million live on less than 2$ a day and 315 million of these live on less than 1$ a day.

Conclusion

From higher income levels over time it is easier to realise greatest number of the others dimensions of development. However the attractiveness of using the per capita economic growth criterion is its very simplicity.

The rate of growth of income per person can be used to judge the progress a nation makes over time, but economists agree that the development of a nation actually encompasses much more than average income per person and the growth rate of that income. There is also wide range of social and human goals beyond this.

The HDI is an imperfect measure of the well being of a nation, just as GNP/GDP. Neither measure is capable of capturing all the critical dimensions of development, but the HDI is broader in some important respects than is a simple income per person indicator.



Get Better Grades Today

Join Essays24.com and get instant access to over 60,000+ Papers and Essays

closeLogin
Please enter your username and password
Username:
Password:
Forgot your password?