Business / Portor'S Threat Of Entry
Portor'S Threat Of EntryThis essay Portor'S Threat Of Entry is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton 24 December 2010
Words: 1045 | Pages: 5
Organizing is a means of putting everything in the proper place. In management, this means properly allocating all types of resources to reach the goals of the organization. This function is important because it defines what will be required and where it will be required.
Leading is a way of getting employees to be enthusiastic about their work and to work well with others in order to benefit the organization. This function is important because it defines how to get the human resources to efficiently follow the roadmap.
Controlling is the part of management that keeps things on track by comparing the current process with the objectives of the organization and making changes necessary to meet those objectives. This function is important because it constantly makes sure the roadmap is being followed.
Part (2) - For each major function of management, tell us about a manager you know or have known who is very effective (i.e., A-level performance) in this function. Use a different manager as an example for each major function, and provide us with the following information:
â€¢ Tell us the manager's first name and the major function at which he or she is very effective
â€¢ Explain to us how this manager works, including some specific methods, techniques, behaviors and or tools that contribute to his or her effectiveness in this function
â€¢ Tell us the manager's level of effectiveness (e.g., A, B, or C) in each of the other three major functions, and overall as a manager, and explain why you rate them at this level of performance
The manager I feel had an â€œAâ€ level of effectiveness in Planning and Strategizing is Bill A. Bill A. was a visionary and could see where the organization needed to be long before anyone else. He tried to anticipate changes in our operating environment and utilized financial forecasts, legal contracts and diversification to gain an operating edge. Unfortunately for Bill A., this was part of his downfall. He was probably 10 years ahead of his time. Another problem for Bill A. was that his level of effectiveness in the other three functions would be â€œCâ€. His ability to organize resources was minimal. His leadership abilities fostered a culture of separation that evolved into an â€œus vs. themâ€ mentality. His Controlling skills were minimal at best. He had no means of logically keeping the organization or projects on track. Overall, I would give Bill A. a level of effectiveness of â€œCâ€. He just could not get things done.
The manager that I feel has an â€œAâ€ level of effectiveness in Organizing is Tom. Tom is the most organized person I have ever met. His meetings have a defined time line and he sticks to them. He plans for things well in advance and makes certain everything is necessary to get done what needs done. Tom could use many software programs to assist him with Organizing, but he chooses not to. He uses a desk calendar and a notepad. He does use MS Word to type documents that he prints and files in the 6 file cabinets in his office. If it would be appropriate, I might give Tom an â€œA-â€œ for not effectively utilizing Technology. He continues to prove that he can get the job done without it. Tom also gets an â€œAâ€ for level of effectiveness in Controlling. Using his pencil and paper, he keeps on top of every project he is in charge of. Tomâ€™s level of effectiveness in Planning and Strategizing would be a â€œCâ€. He fails to see the big picture most of the time. In my opinion, his situation is a classic example of the saying â€œYou canâ€™t see the forest through the trees.â€ He is so busy operating that pencil and paper, no wonder he canâ€™t see the big picture. Tomâ€™s level of effectiveness in Leading is a â€œBâ€. Tom does layout goals and objectives clearly and his employees definitely work together to achieve the objectives he gives them. Overall, I would give Tom a level of effectiveness of â€œBâ€. He gets the job done, but has room for improvement.
The manager that I feel has an â€œAâ€ level of effectiveness in Leading is Terri. Terri is a caring person and demonstrates her leadership abilities by talking to employees in a manner that they want to help her achieve the goals she puts forth. Her personality and caring are her best tools. Planning and Strategizing would be Terriâ€™s weak point with a level of effectiveness being a â€œCâ€. Terri sometimes sees the easy way through a project as the best way. This has come back to haunt her more than once. Organizing and Controlling I would say are both on a level of effectiveness of â€œBâ€. She does a decent job of making sure everything is in place and keeps projects on task. Overall, I would give Terri a level of effectiveness of â€œBâ€. She gets the job done, but need some assistance in Planning and Strategizing. She also has room for improvement.
The manager that I feel has an â€œAâ€ level of effectiveness in Controlling is Bill B. Bill B. has many projects to keep track of and he does so very efficiently. He is manager of several teams in several areas. Bill B. uses software extensively to manage his people and projects. Bill B. uses MS Project, MS Outlook (Tasks and Calendar), a custom developed Maintenance software and a Workflow software called EDMS.NET. Bill B.â€™s level of effectiveness in Planning and Strategizing I would say is a â€œBâ€. Early on in a project, he tends to focus on details and sometimes loses sight of long term goals. I would say Bill B. is a â€œBâ€ in Organizing also. He can get things into their proper place, but sometimes has a hard time keeping them there. Leading is where I would say Bill B. is a â€œCâ€. His leadership is somewhat weak in that he sometimes allows his employees to run the show. Bill B. also feverishly avoids conflict. Overall, I would give Bill B. a level of effectiveness of â€œBâ€. He gets the job done, but has room for improvement.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R. & Balkin, D. B. (2002) Management, (pp. 5-6). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies
Get Better Grades Today
Join Essays24.com and get instant access to over 60,000+ Papers and Essays