English / Nasa Decline And Decadence, A Black Eye On A Proud Nation
Nasa Decline And Decadence, A Black Eye On A Proud NationThis essay Nasa Decline And Decadence, A Black Eye On A Proud Nation is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton 31 December 2010
Words: 2167 | Pages: 9
NASA decline and decadence, a black eye on a proud nation
Space is one of the last frontiers to be conquered by men. Ever since the onset of humanity we have wondered and dreamed what would be to travel amongst the stars. In 1962, President John F. Kennedy, in what became one of the most famous speeches of the twentieth century, proposed going to the moon by the end of a decade. During the time of his speech, the only American who had traveled into space was Alan Shepard, who flew on a fifteen minute suborbital flight. Less than eight years after President Kennedyâ€™s speech, Neil Armstrong became the first man to walk on the moon on the moon. Yet when we talk about NASA all people seem to recall are the noted failures of the space agency, and disasters like the Space Shuttles Challenger, Columbia and, more recently the Novak scandal and drunken pilots in space. Has NASA lost its touch? Does NASA no longer have the right stuff as it was so eloquently put in Tom Wolfes book The Right Stuff.
Most recently there have been many new issues and scandal which have come to light , which have rocked the very foundation of the space agency itself. Scandals the likes of the Nowak murder plot, Drunk Astronauts and even sabotage by government contractors. Have caused the nation to loose faith on the famed spaced agency. But these issues are only the top layer of deep and rooted problem. Many of the issues coming to light today are on-going issues of the past. For example during the fiscal year of 2004 NASA had the budget of 15.469 billion dollars, approximately 6.6 billion dollars were requested for the Space Shuttle program and the International Space Station (ISS) and its affiliated research program. Sounds like a lot of money, right?, Take into account the cost of launching a Space Shuttle is about 500 million dollars, add to this expense of the payload, maintenance crew, and after flight activities and it will cost the tax payer almost one billion dollars to launch a shuttle with a standard payload and crew. As Dr. Robert Zubrin, founder of The Mars Society, observes in his book Entering Space, the high cost of the Space Shuttle is due to the fact that it is designed incorrectly. The parts that not reused is positioned on the bottom of the stack, where it could easily be reused. The reusable portion leaves and reenters the atmosphere, which means it must be hardened to deal with a violent reentry. This increases the cost of both construction and maintenance (29-30).
Many of NASAs problems start before a project even goes to the drawing board. Unlike most bid systems, NASA chooses a contractor before the price is named. Instead of setting a price bar for each contract, NASA finds the company and let it name it price. Then the companies are allowed to add a small percentage above those costs to make a profit (Zubrin 24). This system alone, allows for the mismanagement of funds and the waste of precious money which could be well spent somewhere else. The system also allows contractors to add overhead and extra managers that actually do nothing, other than increasing the cost of the project and therefore the contractorâ€™s lines his pocket with tax payers money. All the while NASA endorses projects and then cancels the without due regards to how the money is spent. For example, in 2001, NASA cancelled the X-33 project, a concept design for a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, after investing 912 million dollars (Key X-33 Events in 2001, Para. 4). Other promising projects have been scraped in the same way, the X-34 and the X-37, also concepts for new manned space vehicles.
With all of these problems, one might say that NASA has outlived their usefulness. This is not the case. With the proper direction and reallocation of resources, NASA can again inspire the new generations as it did during the time of President Kennedy. The first project that would improve NASA image would be to resurrect the majority of the X-projects, and eventually replace the current shuttle system with one more cost efficient ground-to-orbit vehicle. When this is proposed, it will be undoubtedly opposed to. Politicians will argue â€œit will cost to much money to produce a new space systemâ€. One set of figures proposed states it will take â€œten years and twenty billion dollars to develop a new space planeâ€ While this sounds like a lot of time and money. But if we look at the bigger picture you have to notice, this amount of money is not an absurd amount for NASA. Given that the Shuttle costs one billion dollars per launch, and launches four times each year. So, when one does the math. NASA spends approximately four billion dollars each year on the Shuttle program and it lunches four times each year this equals to sixteen billion dollars each year to launch the shuttle, and yet it will cost twenty billion dollars to the develop a new space plane. When you add everything up, NASA would rather spend 160 billion dollars in ten year of operations instead for wisely spending twenty billon dollars in ten years to develop a cost effective space craft, and advance the exploration of space. Pretty ironic when you come to think of it? Even if administrators say that the Shuttle must fly while the new space plane is under development, eliminating one flight per year would produce the necessary amount of money needed to pay for the development of a new space plane in twenty years. The majority of this time can be spent in acquisitions and research prior to the construction of the new space plane would ever start, and once the new craft is ready, the Shuttle can then be retired. Leaving NASA with a cheaper and more reliable way to get to orbit with the capability to increase the frequency of their launches. This would benefit NASA to ways; one the public will see their hard earned money is put to well use; two, it will allow NASA to modernize and replace their aging fleet, bring themselves to the standards of the twenty first century and concentrate in research and conquest of space. Above all mankind can renew the desire it once had for space exploration
Another project NASA needs to undertake to improve its image is revamping the space station program into one which produces results. The main problem with the ISS is the large cost-to-science ratio. To much time fixing it and not enough time researching. Citing a study done by NASA while designing the station, Zubrin states that the current design was not supported by a blue ribbon panel of scientists and engineers (24). Another thing NASA can use to improve its coast effectiveness would be to design a compact space module system, which can be easily transported in a vast in a larger quantity with less frequent lunches. This plan would allow for more productivity in space with lesser launches and the end result will be the same, a space station that has approximately the same internal volume as the current design, but it would cost less money and be assembled faster.
Finally, to improve its image in the eyes of the public, NASA must reach beyond Earths orbit. NASA need to once again become an ambitious agency. Remember In less than eight years, NASA went from a suborbital flight to a manned moon mission, yet since 1972 no human being has left traveled any further than earths orbit. The moon landings of 1969-72 created an immense amount of science, thanks to the research that was developed and developing technology, but they also sparked a national interest in the science and study of space for that entire generation. Now a days NASA has no ambitions, it has no program the likes of lunar landing missions, and so it has lost the admiration of the general public. Why not try a mission to Mars, the interest this would generate on the American public would also re-inspire confidence in NASA, and it would greatly improve their public image. I would generate the space fever of the sixties and seventies. The announcement alone would be a sensational one, which might reignite a new space race. Another thing NASA can do and that we have the technology to accomplish would be to return to the moon and colonize it. It would be a giant step for man to form the first human colonies in space, think of the amount of research and technology that can be produce by being able to live and work in the moon for extended and undetermined periods of time, and better yet it would inspire another generation of engineers and scientists, to reach beyond the stars. These programs are well within NASAs grasp. With little difficulty, the return to the moon can be accomplished by using Apollo-era technology, as can the first manned mission to Mars.
According to NASAs 90-day report, the government estimates for a manned Mars mission have been as high as 450 billion dollars. However, private citizens have designed missions in the 20-30 billion dollar range that accomplish more science and exploration. It is true that
NASA has a lot of problems, but they are all solvable, they just have to be willing to mold itself into an agency for the twenty first century. All NASA needs to do is bring in some fresh and inquisitive minds and allow for the relocation of founds and stop allowing the on going fraud waste and abuse of the tax-payers money. The allocations of found would pay for a cheaper, better space plane, a space station with more scientific capabilities, and a manned mission to Mars and the colonization of the moon. At the same time, a new generation of scientists and engineers would be inspired, and many of them would then be able to bring new ideas to NASA. This will create an explosion of technological evolution, and it will make both NASA and space a part of every day life. These are radical changes, but they need to be made, in order to move out of the human and space comfort zone. It is imperative that NASA improve its public image with the American people, the United States risks losing sight of space and all the wealth and progress it has to offer. As citizens and tax payers we need to band together and demand our hard earned money is invested properly. With our support and the proper guidance, NASA may once again be returned to its glory, and once again be known as the finest space agency in the world.
(25 March 2003) House Science Committee Views and Estimates Fiscal Year 2004 - Part 1. 5 .
Retrieved July 25, 2007 http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html
Humans To Mars. 2002. Retrieved July 25, 2007
(25 April 2001) Key X-33 Events in 2001.. Retrieved July 23, 2007
Siceloff, S. (January 2001) GAO Calls NASA Management of Station Budget High Risk.
Retrieved July 25, 2007
Space Station Assembly. Retrieved July 25, 2007
Zubrin, Robert. Entering Space. NewYork: J. P. Tarcher, 2000
The Big story with John Gibson, July 27, 2007 Re: NASA Rocked by Scandals
Retrieved July 27, 2007 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,291448,00.html
NASA Fires Astronaut Novak, March 7, 2007 Retrieved July 27, 2007
Get Better Grades Today
Join Essays24.com and get instant access to over 60,000+ Papers and Essays