History Other / Who Is Responsible For The Columbine Killings?
Who Is Responsible For The Columbine Killings?This essay Who Is Responsible For The Columbine Killings? is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database.
Autor: anton 30 August 2010
Words: 1340 | Pages: 6
Cause Ð’â€“ Effect
Even since the shooting at Columbine High School caught the attention of America and all the world on April 20, 1999, high school shootings and other forms of violence at schools has been plaguing America during the last ten years. It is also found that most of the violence that occurs in high schools is caused by young men. Students aren't feeling safe at school anymore and parents are enraged that students could bring the weapons to school in the first place. Many people have brought their own opinions into play about why violence in schools occurs. Such causes range from violence in the media, being treated poorly by peers and administrators in school, all the way to poor parental decisions. Although these are only a few of the possible causes for violence in schools, they are defiantly the most prevalent reasons.
Violence in the media has long been a possible cause for people to commit violent acts. Everyone has seen a violent television show, watched a violent movie or listened to music depicting graphic violence. These forms of media are available to people of all ages across the United States. A major cause of high school violence may be discovered here. Columbine high school shooters Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris were avid listeners to violent music such as Slipknot and KMFDM. Both groups feature very dark and twisted lyrics, which the shooters listened too without a doubt. Are the lyrics in the music to blame for the violent behavior of two of the group's listeners? Another possible source of the hatred that some shooters have may lie in the television shows they watched. Violent television shows are everywhere today; many primetime or late night shows carrying "Parental Discretion Is Advised" disclaimers. In all honesty the disclaimers shown there are more likely to draw younger viewers in to watch the show, rather than keeping them away. "I don't know if it made me want to watch it more, it's just like, I don't know it's kinda like an advertisement for some cool shit [especially swearing and guns]" Bradley University Freshman Jim Hering said. It seems to be very clear that younger Americans are going to want to watch such shows, regardless of the warnings that the television station puts on before a particular show. Exposing young Americans to such violent shows as "NYPD Blue" graphically show shootings, harsh beatings etc on a regular basis. Exposing people to such things can do nothing but desensitize them to real live violence. The third media medium that has come under heavy fire lately is the video game industry. Nothing could instill a sense of violence into the mind of a person more strongly than actually controlling the person carrying the gun, and consciously shooting another player, just for fun. The Columbine shooters both enjoyed playing a game called Quake 2, an extremely violent (at the time) game released by a software company called id software. The game puts you in control of 8 weapons, from pistols and rocket launchers, to models of the shotguns the two shooters used in their terrible crime. One thing that troubles many Americans is how graphic these so called "First Person Shooters" have gotten since the Columbine days. Now, players are armed with far more realistic weapons, and are able to choose where their shots will land on the body of an enemy. In the Quake days, all shots looked the same when they hit an enemy, a body shot. Now, with games such as Counter-Strike and Soldier of Fortune you can actually tell a difference in the amount of damage that a person takes based on where you shoot them. In the later game, each and every shot that hits your enemy has it's on entry, and exit wounds. Each time you slash the enemy with your knife, a slash appears on the enemy's body wherever you hit them. In today's age of violence among teenagers, is it really appropriate to have software designers such as id continue to make such violent games? Obviously seeing and hearing violence every day, it may be a fair assumption to make that the media's exposure of such violent acts may have caused Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris to commit their heinous crime on April 20, 1999.
A second possible cause for students to come to school with firearms could be poor treatment by others at school. This doesn't mean exclusively by other students, but by administrators and teachers as well. In the case of the Columbine and Thurston and high school shootings, all the shooters in the above listed schools were mistreated by people at school in one way or another. The Thurston shooter was practically ignored when he asked for help at school. In the words of his sister:
"He would study for hours and not pass. In first grade, second grade, and third grade, I remember him studying for those spelling tests over and over. I never studied for spelling, and all he wanted to do was pass. And I used to make fun of his writing, because that's what big sisters do. He would confuse his 3s and his Es, and Bs and Ds. He'd write them wrong, and I used to make fun of him, "Ha, ha, ha, you messed up here."
The young shooter was having great difficulty at school, and was utterly ignored by his teacher when he cried out for help. Perhaps all his built up frustration and anger was what caused him to snap and bring two guns to school. In the case of the Columbine shootings the two shooters were constantly bullied by the jocks at school. Why were they bullied? Because they were different. It is possible that the shooters found it necessary to "get back" at the jocks in such a violent way that no one would ever want to bully the outsiders anymore. Mistreatment at school is defiantly a cause in the violent behavior that the shooters display.
The third and final reason for such violent acts among high schoolers without a doubt is poor parenting. The parents of all the students in all of the high school shootings across America could have stopped their sons from committing such violent acts years before they happened. Especially in the cases of the Thurston and Columbine shootings, the parents neglect played a major role in the build-up if hatred within their sons. The young man who shot his fellow students at Thurston high school actually murdered his parents in an act of ultimate frustration. What would cause a boy to kill his own parents? A teenage boy craves attention, attention that only takes a few minutes for parents to give. His parents didn't offer attention, much less offer help when he was struggling in school. The fact that the parents totally ignored their son had much to do with the shooting. The case with the Columbine shooters is quite similar. Klebold's parents were fairly wealthy and felt that replacing their personal attention with toys, computers and other kinds of distractions would be good enough to satisfy their son. In doing this, they ignored his playing violent computer games, they ignored his enjoyment of violent music, they didn't see that he was learning through the internet how to make high powered bombs and worst of all they didn't know that he was stockpiling weapons and ammunition. One thing that is baffling is that Klebold was in possession of a Tec-9 machine pistol, a tough to find automatic weapon. How could the parents ignore such obvious signs that something was wrong with their sons? Before anything is blamed for a child's actions, you need to look at the parents.
Get Better Grades Today
Join Essays24.com and get instant access to over 60,000+ Papers and Essays