Read full version essay Criminal Justice 1

Criminal Justice 1

Print version essay is available for you! You can search Free Term Papers and College Essay Examples written by students!.
Join Essays24.com and get instant access to Criminal Justice 1 and over 30,000 other Papers and Essays

Category: Book Reports

Autor: anton 16 November 2010

Words: 621 | Pages: 3

I believe that we do have a criminal justice system, however flawed it may be. Our system

has become unique to each individual, in the different ways each situation is handled. This

country’s criminal justice system has structured itself to our “capitalistic society”. Because in our

society, money does talk. The fact is, one cannot just go out and pay a fee to commit murder and

then its over with. However, an individual that has a lot of money can afford the best attorney that

money can buy and they can take all precautions necessary, that they can by spending money, to

ensure they do not go to jail. An example of this is the O.J. Simpson case.

The O.J. case was again unique to his situation. He bought one of the best lawyers money

can buy. Then in turn that lawyer(Robert Shapiro) went out and made a team that could rival any

defense team ever put together. Money in this case was the key to keeping O.J. out of jail. Almost

all of the evidence collected put O.J. at the place and time the murder occurred. Now this is one

thing the defense couldn’t dispute and they knew that. But when you have a team of lawyers that

is the best money can buy, you can be sure they will do everything in their power no to win

necessarily, but keep you out of jail. That is exactly what they did, at the end of the case O.J.

Simpson was not found to be innocent, but rather not guilty. Now the fact is, if this person on trial

was a garbage man in New York City, he probably would be in jail right now. If he was assigned a

public defender, his chances of staying out of jail drop dramatically. Public defenders are always

over booked and understaffed, so that will limit your chances automatically. But if he hired his

own lawyer, he wouldn’t be able to pay for a high profile lawyer suck as Robert Shapiro.

So, obviously we do have a criminal justice system and in can provide justice at times. But

it is most definitely flawed. As shown in the Simpson case, money does buy you a verdict.

Perhaps our justice system is suited for lesser crimes and cannot be applied to celebrities and

athletes or politicians. It seems whenever someone with money go into a court room, they come

out unscathed. But when a lesser crime is committed by someone who does not have as much

money, our system seems to provide justice in the appropriate manner.

For a certain case to be double jeopardy, it means a person would have to have gone

to trial twice and have been convicted of the same criminal act both times. There are three

examples that are argued to be double jeopardy, the O.J. trial, the police officers accused of

beating Rodney King and the Miranda trial. All of these cases were not double jeopardy. Some

people may argue that they were. But in every case, the first time the person or party went to trial,

they were not convicted. O.J. was acquitted in a criminal court however he lost in a civil case. So,

he won the first time and lost the second trial. The officers in the Rodney King beating, they were

acquitted for undue force, but they were convicted in federal court for violating civil rights. Last

but not least, the supreme court threw out the Miranda case because a confession was

inadmissable. However, Miranda was later convicted for the same charges in another trial. So, it is

impossible for these cases to be double

jeopardy when nobody was convicted in their first trial appearance.

Read Full Essay