Descartes

Evaluate Descartes' argument that the mind and body are distinct substances?

Descartes believed that the mind and the body were two distinct substances that are very much different, each having its own function and purpose. Descartes considers the body as nothing more than "Ð'...a kind of mechanism that is outfitted with and composed of bones, nerves, muscles, veins, blood and skin" (Descartes 100), that would act in the same function and "motion" if no mind existed in it. He gives the example of an amputated limp; if a foot or an arm were taken off the body, the mind would continue to will, sense, and understand. Descartes regards the body as a mass that is extended in space. He goes on to explain that any extended or corporeal thing can be divisible into parts as like the body. The mind however can not be divided into parts; it is one complete and cohesive unit according to Descartes' understanding. This conclusion certifies "that the mind [is] wholly diverse from the body" (Descartes 101)

Descartes further explains how the brain is the intermediate connection between the body and the mind. He believes that the brain or even a small portion of the brain, namely the section where the "common sense" resides is the connection to the body. Descartes considers the brain as the only component of the body that if taken away, the mind and body would not interact harmoniously.

It is my belief that Descartes has a sound argument regarding the relationship between the mind and body. He makes a great point to the fact that the mind could continue to function and carry on properly if a piece of the body was eliminated.

This is an immense validation because it is exceedingly factual. An example would be a Vietnam victim at Walter Reed Hospital in a wheel chair with amputated legs who has the same mind capabilities as the able-bodied doctor that is assisting him. After great pondering and immense

...