Hamlet's Paradox Of Man
Essay by 24 • September 12, 2010 • 923 Words (4 Pages) • 1,829 Views
Shakespeare was a man ahead of his time. He was a man who had an ability to
portray the inner workings of humanity. Throughout his masterful works he was able to
peer into the human psyche and capture emotions like no other writer has been able to do.
He filled every one of his plays, most notably Hamlet, with eternal truths concerning
human emotions. Shakespeare develops the paradox of man and contradictions of
humanity with imagery, ironic siloques, and philosophical rants by Hamlet and Claudius.
No one has ever returned from the dead. Nobody knows exactly what life after
death is like. This is the thesis of Hamlet's first paradox. The saying that "grass is always
greener on the other side of the fence" does not hold true when dealing with human life.
Life is a struggling, so why do we endure it? Hamlet reminds us that " . . . in that sleep of
death what dreams may come,/ When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,/ Must give us
pause" (III.i.67-69). The reason that people do not give up their lives is because they do
not know what it is to become of them after they die. Man is trapped in life by the enigma
of death---the unknowns. He generally wishes to give his life up for something better; he
cannot because there is no knowing whether death is a better alternative or not. Even
though a better life is promised to us after death, one cannot get ot that place when taking
one's own life.
Shakespeare notes that the Scriptures disapprove of suicide. This is another reason
that men do not take their live. Hamlet wishes, "that the Everlasting that had not fixed/
His cannon 'gainst self-slaughter" (I.ii.131-132) after finding out that his father was killed
by his uncle. This passage strikes less loudly against the soul of humanity now than it did
when Hamlet was written. Poepl were incredibly religious in Shakespeare's time, probably
more so than today. Fewer people in today's society probably believe as strongly that
suicide is a sin. However, one can still see the paradox of the situation. Religfion is a
choice, one can believe it or not. By taking hold of it, Hamlet is disallowed something that
he seeks, his death. The irony lies in the acceptance of a religion that disallows the things
that are coveted by Hamlet. He is a very devout Christian by choice. One can see
throughout his speeches. However, he wishes to forsake one of Christianity's tenets
against suicide, and yet he remains dedicated to the faith. He accepts something that he
disagrees with, that withholds something that he covets. So many people would abandon
the faith to get what they want. This shows the contradiction and conviction of Hamlet's
instincts.
It should be noted that not everyone wishes to move on to a better place. Most of
these peopleare very materialistic. Shakespeare makes a great point in Hamlet that in the
end everyone is going to die. Hamlet reveres death as the great equalizer, " . . . fat king
and lean beggar is bur variable service---two dishes but to one table" (IV.iii.23-24). The
paradoxis that though a man may strive to break away from the pack, in the end no
concessions are given to him. Even the most revered man will become just like the rest of
the dead, dust on the ground. Hamlet reflects after speaking to a gravedigger that
"Imperious Caesar, dead and turned to clay,/Might stop a hole to keep the wind away"
(V.i.216-217).
...
...