Accounting For Managers
Essay by 24 • April 17, 2011 • 3,566 Words (15 Pages) • 1,322 Views
Page 1 of 16
MBA Assignment Two
Accounting for Managers
Written by {Author Removed} {Author Removed} { Removed} Registration Number
{ Removed}
Prepared for Mark Makepeace - Management Centre
Word Count: 3857
Page 2 of 16
Contents Page
1. Assumptions made in order to complete assignment
2. Ratio Analysis of Company "X"
3. Ratio Analysis of Company "Y"
4. Ratio Analysis of Company "Z"
5. Summary of ratios
6. Overview
7. Marginal and Absorption Costing
8. Summary
9. Bibliography
Page 3 of 16
Assumptions
In order to complete this assignment, the following assumptions have been made.
1. A similar sales figure for all three companies has been assumed and this is
illustrated in the appendix 1. Although in reality, a similar sales figure would
not be the case. Whilst a sales figure is not vital in answering the question, this
helped me in my thinking.
2. The figures represented in appendix 1 are of course purely arbitrary and have
been included purely to illustrate my thought process and support the
assignment. I have based these figures on a mean average sales figure of
Ј13.4bn. This being a sales average for Tesco, Sainsbury and Safeway for
2002. Whilst the assignment question did not indicate the type, size and nature
of the food retailer in question. I looked to these businesses as an indication.
(a) Tesco Ј12.7Bn (based on 24 week period)
(b) Sainsbury's Ј18.1Bn
(c) Safeway Ј9.5Bn
3. That the net profit ratio relates to net profit before tax and any dividend.
4. That debtors would be negligible, as retail tends to be cash orientated business.
5. Stock, Creditor and Debtor figures are based on 365 days.
6. Return on Capital Employed is based on profit before interest and tax divided
by fixed assets plus net current assets.
7. The fixed asset figure has been calculated using the capital employed figure.
Example:
If capital employed had equalled 13478 and net assets had equalled 1325. Then
fixed assets are assumed to be 12153 (13478 - 1325).
8. That capital employed is financed by share capital plus reserves and that the
companies have no borrowings.
9. That the ratio figures presented in the question would have been based on
figures calculated on a consistent basis and that all three companies are
following the same accounting concepts and conventions. For example, that all
three companies costs are based on historical costs as opposed to one using
historical costing and the other two using modified costing. Or, that one
company has not based their figures using marginal costing whilst the other
two having used absorption costing.
Page 4 of 16
Company X
Ј - 000
Sales 13478
Cost of Goods Sold @ 85% (Sales minus G.P.B.T) 11456
Gross Profit Before Tax @ 15% 2022
Expenses @ 6% ( G.P.B.T minus N.P.B.T) 809
Net Profit Before Tax @ 9% (G.P.B.T - Expenses) 1213
Corporation Tax @ 30% 243
Net Profit after Tax before Dividend 970
Return on Capital Employed @ 15% 2022
Return on Shareholders funds @ 20% (N.P.A.T - before dividend) 970
Share capital (if 970 equals 20%) 4852
Total Capital Employed (Fixed Assets + Reserves + Net Current Assets) 13478
Current Assets:
Stock - 18 Days (11456 / 365 x 18) 565
Debtors - 9 Days (13478 x 10% - "amount on credit" / 365 x 9) 33
Cash (13478 x 90% / 12 months) 1010
1608
Current Liabilities (amounts falling due within a year)
Creditors - 9 Days (11456 / 365 x 9) 283
Net Current Assets / 1325
Page 5 of 16
Company Y
Ј - 000
Sales 13478
Cost of Goods Sold @ 78% (Sales minus G.P.B.T) 10512
Gross Profit Before Tax @ 22% 2966
Expenses @ 12% (G.P.B.T minus N.P.B.T) 1617
Net Profit Before Tax @ 10% (G.P.B.T - Expenses) 1349
Corporation Tax @ 30% 405
Net Profit after Tax before Dividend 944
Return on Capital Employed @ 13% 2966
Return on Shareholders funds @ 13% (N.P.A.T - before dividend)
...
...