Biggest Conspiracies in Human History

As a child we were taught to believe things that we didn’t understand yet, but as you grow up you start to question things. I certainly do which is why my oral may leave some of you in shock and if all goes well in disbelief.

This is one of the biggest conspiracies in human history. Even though Neil Armstrong ‘supposedly’ landed on the moon on the July 20 1969 this conspiracy has still very much active. Both the media and scientific institutions are trying to resolve this one big question that the world is asking. Has man really been to the moon? This question needs to be answered urgently- this could alter the world as we know it.

 If man (Neil Armstrong) has indeed not been to the moon this can cause rivalries to develop again as it means that America has lied to the world for years now. And this could very well be the start of world war 3. Many people however still believe that man has been to the moon, I disagree and I have the evidence to prove it.  This fact of not knowing the truth could cause disasters of epic proportions as the race to the moon is not over in fact it is only just beginning.

One of the most compelling arguments for the faking of the lunar landing is the lack of stars in both video and photographic evidence. Since you are in space there are no clouds on the moon, so stars should theoretically be much more visible and significantly brighter than what see through earth’s atmosphere.

However NASA claim and I quote from a NASA employee: “The quality of the photographs washes them out, this is reasoning as to why there are no stars.” On top of this NASA claimed that they couldn’t map the exact locations of all the stars and so found it necessary to just all of them out.

Some say this is a good excuse, but considering the fact that you can take pictures of stars from earth under much lower quality and still be able to see the gleaming beacons of light, there is a high probability that the excuse that NASA has made up is lies. There are also very high quality photographs taken but they also do not contain stars. What game is NASA playing?

Under the words of Ralph Rene (a man that has been studying the lunar landing videos for years/an author of the book NASA Mooned America): “Their film stock should have been made useless by the powerful cosmic radiation of the moon, however their film stock was unaffected.” So how did they take the pictures?

Have any of you ever wondered why the American flag that was planted on the moon is moving? It’s as though there was a breeze in the so called ‘airless space’. This all leads to the Apollo lunar landing being faked. This flag has been moving in various videos and photographs taken.

Roger Launius (spaceflight historian of the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum in Washington D.C. ) says that: “the video you see where the flag's moving is because the astronaut just placed it there, and the inertia from when they let go kept it moving.”

According to the Apollo 11 moon-landing photos- it is said that the astronauts ‘indirectly’ bent the horizontal rod that is holding the flag up several times. This created the effect of the rippling flag.One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is at an angle looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the surface of the moon.