Child Abuse

Unit 3 Seminar- Social Process Theories

After reviewing the Social Control Theories, I personally believe that they all provide valuable explanations in regard to delinquency. I agree with all of them, and it is very difficult for me to identify which of the theories "represents the most important elements of and the best argument for social control as a way of preventing and explaining criminal behavior."

After reading the theories I could apply my personal life to each one of the theories. For example, I got into to trouble while I was in junior high because I wanted to know what it was like to break the law. I gave in to the temptations of my peers. Everyone wanted to see the "good kids" get into trouble. Well once I got into trouble, I realized that I didn't want trouble to be a part of my life. I knew that if I continued to do what I was doing I was going to put myself and my family in a predicament that I may not be able to get myself out of, and my future meant world to me. Toby's Stake in the Conformity definitely outlined the thoughts that were going through my head while I was in junior high.

Using Nye's Family and Social Control theory, I was always afraid of getting into trouble because of the punishments I could get from my mother and step-father. Not that they would beat me, but I had a sports life that I wanted to continue to be a part of. In addition, I had a wonder relationship with my mother and step-father. I knew I could talk to them about anything and I always did my best to make them proud. The worst punishment I could get from them was for them to be disappointed in me and that was a big motivator in me staying out of trouble. I have to agree with Nye, my conscience just would have tolerated committing crime not to mention that other than when I was in junior high, I never really felt the desire to steal or anything like that. Then