Civil Disobedience
Essay by 24 • December 4, 2010 • 1,425 Words (6 Pages) • 1,546 Views
All throughout world history, human beings have participated in acts of civil disobedience. However, in the last two centuries the belief and practice of it has been in full swing and has even brought on major historical events, especially concerning equal rights and just laws. Three major firm believers and activists in civil disobedience were Henry David Thoreau, Martin Luther King Jr., and Gandhi. All three of these men participated in acts of civil disobedience but each in his own way and for different reasons. Henry David Thoreau believed that a certain war tax was unjust during the Mexican War and he refused to pay it. This then lead to his arrest and one day in jail where he wrote the essay "Civil Disobedience." Martin Luther King Jr. on the other hand participated in an act of civil disobedience for a much larger and important reason. He was fighting against segregation in America and for equal rights for all American citizens, including black that had been oppressed in America for over 300 years. Loved and followed by thousands, King sought equal rights for both himself and for others through non-violent marches and demonstrations, which in turn led to equal rights for all American citizens including blacks. Gandhi's participation in civil disobedience was by far the most effective and led to one of the most eventful periods in time; the independence of India from British rule. However, even though these men all believed in civil disobedience and equal rights for all, they all achieved their goals through different means and methods, as seen in the three quotes involving different forms of civil disobedience. The three quotes will then be discussed and compared to the works of King, Gandhi, and Thoreau.
The first quote, stated by Robert A Heinlein, discusses a direct form of civil disobedience, in which the protester directly disobeys a rule that they alone find to be too obnoxious or unfair. The person in the passage does not even talk about using negotiations to achieve their goal, instead they directly refuse to follow a rule which a direct rebellion toward the government. This passage relates to Thoreau's method of civil disobedience the most. The reason for this is because Thoreau believed that he had a moral obligation to himself to do what he thought was right, instead of a government who does what they believe is right for its people and themselves. Thoreau stated this best when he said, " the only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right." This is exactly what the first quote was stating, that the protester has an obligation to himself first and can do anything including directly disobey an unjust rule in order to fulfill that obligation. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi on the other hand believed in negotiating with the government first before participating in acts of civil disobedience and they also believed that everyone should still follow the rules and laws, only disobeying them if they oppressed human beings. Martin Luther King Jr. expresses this belief when he stated that, " Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue. It seeks so to dramatize the issue that it can no longer be ignored." Both the passage and Thoreau believed that the people should govern themselves and that there should be no higher power to reside over its citizens and make their rules and decisions for them. So in response, the people can directly disobey a government or leader to fulfill the moral obligation to themselves and to the rest of the people.
The second quote was spoken by Martin Luther King Jr., who stated that he left the court with a smile when he was convicted of a crime where others would leave with a somber face. Martin Luther King Jr., Thoreau, and Gandhi, all believed in spending time in jail as acts of civil disobedience and thought that that was part of the plan in achieving their goals. All three men themselves had previously spent time in jail for their protests against the government, and all three men gladly spent the needed time in jail because it just gave their cause more recognition by people who were either involved or not involved with the movements. Thoreau spent one night in jail after refusing to pay a war tax during the Mexican War believing that it wasn't right that he should have to pay towards killing other human beings. Martin Luther King Jr. was sent to jail on numerous accounts for his involvement in the civil rights movement and even volunteered to go to jail even when there was not a warrant for his arrest. Gandhi also went to jail on numerous occasions and was completely happy to do so believing
...
...