Civil War: The Untold Truth

The Civil War started in 1861, and though it was more than a century ago, there is still controversy and many questions arising about the subject. What were they really fighting over? Should the South have been able to succeed? What were the South's true reasons for succeeding? Was the North's only reason to go to war to free the slaves? Were Slaves truly treated as cruelly as we are to believe they were? Did the Abolitionists have other motives hidden behind tightly shut doors, which were not made public? These are only a few questions people want to know the answers to regarding the American's War against themselves. Some of these questions are hard to give a definite answer to, and say what is exactly is correct.

History textbooks in the public schools, private schools, even homeschools, answer these questions, but are they really the truth? The textbooks are written in the North's point of view, the winners of the war. They are telling us what they want us to think the reasons for the war really were. But they might leave out little key parts that aren't beneficial to their view.

Did the Northern industrialists want a war to end slavery? No, not to end slavery, but to end the South or, put more accurately, they wanted an end to the Southern power and influence in the Nation. They, or those members of the industrialist clique, who dominated the Republican Party then, were determined to dominate the country by whatever means; but slavery was too profitable for it to be ended until they could "bring off their grandiose plan of domination". There was no way they could have both the profits of slavery and domination of the nation; and domination was far more important. Forcing an end to slavery was the handiest method of destroying the South.

The Industrialists did not originate the abolition crusade. That developed coincidentally and played into their hands as conflicting interests moved the two sections toward confrontation. The Industrialists knew that the abolitionists were not going to end slavery. The Industrialists were realists; the abolitionists were not. But the abolition movement was creating a climate for war, and that was what the industrialists wanted. It was as simple as that, too simple for most people to appreciate.

Slavery was the real reason for the war. It was the emotional part of the war. The Northerners knew that if they found every newspaper clipping having something negative to do with slavery, and publish it, making it seem as if all of the South was beating and torturing the slaves, people's emotions would start to flare up. Which is exactly what happened. Civilians started getting the impression that the slaves were being treated horribly, and they were ready to intervene.

The big behind-the-scenes northern industrialists with their enormous financial resources were making political decisions, and these hardheaded people were not playing for sunflower seeds. They were out to win more enormous wealth and power. The fifteen states in the Southern block were Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia (including what is now West Virginia). These fifteen states comprised all the land in the country where Slave labor could be used profitably in large numbers and to better advantage than white labor. The South had reached its peak of expansion. There were eight million white people and four and a half million Negroes, and nowhere could the South look for additional political strength. In the North there were nineteen million white people and one-forth million Negroes and a vast area of undeveloped territory which was rapidly being settled with people whose economic interests would not be with the South. Against such odds, the South could not hope to hold its own against the Union. On every issue, the South was being and would continue to be outvoted, especially on commercial regulations. Paying high prices for what it bought and getting low prices for what it sold would have brought the South completely under the domination of the North, the "North" really being the rest of the country.

The South is always looked on as if the only reason they wanted war was to be able to keep their slaves; they wanted slavery and being able to own someone else's gave them a thrill. This is another lie. The attitude of the South has never been well understood because the insistence of the abolitionists upon instant and unconditional emancipation forcing the South to defend slavery whereas the South most wanted an end to it. No practical plan for ending slavery was being proposed by anybody, perhaps because there was none. "Cool heads" might have worked out a plan for some kind of gradual emancipation, which could have been preparation for the impact of farm machinery later on; but there could be few cool heads in the climate created by radical, fanatical abolition.

The South should have been able to succeed if they wanted to. There was no where were it said once a State became part of the Union it had to stay. On the contrary, it says that if a State feels as if it needs to leave the Union, the State may do so. The North was in the wrong for forcing the South to stay. The Constitution states that all men are equal, and the abolitionists were trying to get that point across in freeing the slaves; but the South was not being treated "equal". They were being over-taxed for manufactured goods, and under-paid for their crops the northern factories needed.

History textbooks come across as if the majority of the slaves were not fed, cared for, and were beaten regularly by their masters. Yet again, another lie. Most slaves were lucky to be bought in the United States. If they were not bought here, they were shipped off to Haiti, the Dominican Republic or Cuba. There, the majority of the slaves were beaten regularly. If a slave could be bought in the United States, it was the