Death Penalty
Essay by 24 • November 22, 2010 • 822 Words (4 Pages) • 1,224 Views
A very controversial subject that brings about many questions is the death penalty. Many
people believe that putting people to death for their criminal actions is wrong. In H L Mencken's
passage, "The Penalty of Death," he talks about the positive aspects of the death penalty. He
covers the point of view of the people that have to administer the execution and how it's a
horrible experience. Unlike Michael Kroll's passage, "The Unquiet Death of Robert Harris,"
which tells us about the death of his friend and is very moving. He decides to cover the negative
views using facts from a personal experience. In the view of many people, the death penalty is
not the way to teach criminals a lesson. The two passages have different views on what is right
verse what is wrong.
In H.L Mencken's passage, "The Penalty of Death," he divides it into two parts. The first
part is the argument discussing what the people that execute the criminals have to go through.
The other part is that sentencing someone to the death penalty won't stop people from
committing the same crime. He says that "there are many other jobs that are unpleasant, and yet
no one thinks of abolishing them..." (Pg 432) He fails to talk about the family of the accused and
the other people who have to witness it. His statements are unsympathetic, blunt and very harsh.
He compares the job of being a garbage man to the job of being an executer. There's nothing
similar about taking out the garbage and killing a person. "I have known many who delighted in
their ancient art, and practiced it proudly" (pg 433). Mencken goes into talking about Katharsis,
which means "letting off steam" which is basically its getting revenge on someone. People
"primarily like the satisfaction of seeing the criminal actually before them suffer as he made them
suffer" (pg 433). The death penalty should be named a crime also. It's the "deliberate and
inexcusable taking of human life," (pg 434). Any lesser penalty makes other feel that the
criminal was not punished enough. What about the innocent people who are put to death, and
minutes later found out to actually be innocent. Mencken states, "After all, everyone of us must
die soon or late, and a murderer, it must be assumed, is one who makes that sad fact the
cornerstone of his metaphysic" (pg 434). Who gives anyone the right to decided when you
should die? A harsher punishment would be to let the criminal sit and think about what he's
done. These are just a few examples on why the death penalty is questionable.
In Michael Kroll's passage, "The Unquiet Death of Robert Harris," he gives a personal
explanation of witnessing the death penalty first hand. He talks about the death of his friend
Robert
...
...