Implementation of Regional Development in Australia
Essay by eudicus • June 19, 2015 • Term Paper • 4,651 Words (19 Pages) • 1,348 Views
Implementation of Regional Development in Australia
Name
Professor
Institution
Course
Date
Implementation of Regional Development in Australia
Factors influencing the growth of small region economies
Definition of small region Economies
The term region does not have a specific meaning. In real sense, the real meaning of the term is purpose driven. Moreover, in all occurrences the significance implies some spatial element, based on some set of features common to the area, and uncommon or not valid to outside the area. Regions seldom coincide neatly with sensible authorities. The word region can be used in an international perspective to describe business partners in a distinct part of the globe economy. In a country situation, the word region can be defined by the political control to influence government strategy and organizations for instance the region of Australia. At the sub country level, the word may be used to describe the state, province, precinct, territory or planning zone over which a regime or its organization (agents) has power and authority. The term may also be used to refer to the region based on its model of settlement for instance, non-metropolitan and metropolitan regions) or major kind of economic activity like growing grape, tourism and forestry regions. Still, another meaning of region is based on socio-economic functions for example ethnic group and income group. Actually, the word region can be defined on many bases.
Region or area is a geographical term, showing that the world, the nation, or the continent has been separated into sections according to some standards. For instance, the pacific region comprises of all nations surrounded by the ocean, or literals of those nations. It is probable to treat every state of the Australia as a region. To regard South Australia as region of regions, each is based around some very useful distinguishing features. Too simple for our reasons is the major use of the word regional South Australia referring to all the non-metropolitan area. The non-metropolitan region contains variety, which can carefully be distinguished.
Various regional markets display substantial difference in their physical features. Regions vary in their location, size, natural resource and climate. The features simply represent fixed characteristics for specific regions: In disparity to developed characteristics like quality of government or port facility. Because they can be quite important effects on a regions opportunity position, the question is posed: how does the characteristic of region affects the locality for activity. One of very most significant distinctive attributes of settlement patterns and the activities within countries is their extreme unevenness.
Regional economist and economic geographers refer to diverse approach to the description of a region. In particular: harmonized or uniform regions, functional or nodal regions and planning areas. All of them with the exception of the last meanings are operational regions. Standardized region is based on perspective that a region can be traced according to specific uniform characteristics. These features are determined by the specific interest of the observer for instance, per capita income, similar production structures, unemployment levels, general social economic features, same distribution of work force, geological factors such as climate or topography, and dominant natural resources. Non-economic criterion is also functional such as uniformity of culture, social attitudes, race or political outlook. The major issue in giving meaning to regions in terms of uniformity is that the limits of such areas tend to be distorted (Reid, 2013)
The functional or nodal region is explained in terms of functional or interactional connections between various workings within a space. The communications are calculated by flow of occurrence, the heaviest flow being to and from the node. In disparity to uniform regions, nodal areas consist of varied units, but functionally, they are bounded with each other. An example of the flow occurrence is the fright, passenger movement, migration flows, communication traffic, and central location of society facilities.
The major problem with the nodal definition is that finding the controlling nucleus or center of the nodal area tends to detract from defining the limit of the region. Moreover, even when the interrelationship and functionality are clear, reliance’s are not. For instance, rural town may be the center of the grape of the developing region. If the towns were abolished, the region can survive by conveying grapes elsewhere. On the contrary, if the region were removed could the township survive-the flow occurrence alone does not give answer to the question of dependency.
Planning regions are distinct in terms of unity of financial decision-making and are usually designated by a specific authority. Such kind of authorities includes the government, which decides and determines local and state government political electorates and boundaries. If planning areas are defined accidentally, or the controlling authority loses power over the region or economic activity patterns varies over time then the verdict planning will become unproductive and the region becomes irrelevant as defined.
Regions can be explained in terms of set features of service providers, for instance, postal code which shows/reflect the operational distinctiveness explicit to postal services, and defined as the compilation of data like ABS arithmetical divisions.
In general, the effect of globalization on regional financial system makes it more complicated to identify regional limits in a geographic sense. A communication and transport costs decrease, the exchange of information and trade from anywhere in the globe makes location less significant. Globalization is redefining areas/regions according to the relative advantage offered.
[pic 1]
Significantly, if the factors of production are flexible, the relative advantage cannot be defined. In a standard work, Uren et al., (2013) proposed that the forces that make regions to be put not only on opinionated boundaries, but also on the level of factor mobility. Looking at the case of Barossa valley, the favorable climate and soil are significantly relatively importance in growing very high value grapes for wine. All these factors are constant, at least until biotechnology marks the development of grapes in constructions using simulated means. In the valley of silicon, the information technology labor is highly mobile and world class. Forces that countervail to return these employees in the region are to do with the synergy of clustering and benefits.
...
...