Individualism In Early American Literature
Essay by 24 • June 9, 2011 • 1,045 Words (5 Pages) • 3,127 Views
Early American literature is full of the spirit of individualism. This spirit can best
be described by Emerson when he says, "Good men must not obey the laws too well".
This view has long been an inspiration for future generations of Americans to start some
of the greatest reformations of our history. Among the literary units that show support for
Emerson's idea, there are three that are more powerful at conveying this spirit. The
Revolutionaries, the Transcendentalists, and the Dark Romantics, all support Emerson's
quote because they show that a truly righteous individual is not one that conforms to
society's standards, but rather judges his/her actions based on his/her reason and what
he/she has discovered to be right through experience.
Emerson defends his quote in Self-Reliance with his view that one cannot
derive his/her happiness from following society's standards, but rather from following
his/her own hard work. In this work, Emerson argues that "no kernel of nourishing corn
can come to him but through his toil" (Emerson 225). The reason given for this powerful
statement is because he states that "imitation is suicide" (Emerson 225). Emerson is
arguing for the need of people to be independent in thought. This means that if society's
standards do not follow the individual's reason, then the individual has the right to
disregard the law. Strong opposition, therefore, should be expected for those who attempt
to find truth through non-standard ways. After going through a list of great people who
were misunderstood, Emerson assures that "to be great is to be misunderstood" (Emerson
225). This changes the definition of a good person, from a good law-follower, into a self-
reliant, independent thinker, who makes wise decisions. Because of this new definition,
Emerson supports his own quote by showing that the laws were against the great people
of history, so a good man must not be preoccupied with the law.
The earliest time period that supports Emerson's individualism is the
Revolutionary era, from which, comes the "Speech to the Virginia Convention", given by
Patrick Henry. Individualism is present from the start because of Henry's support for
fighting against British authority. Every revolutionary is putting their life on the line
because each one is committing the highest crime, treason. However, Henry shows his
willingness to give his life for the sake of his country's independence with the statement
"give me liberty of give me death!" (Henry 104). Each revolutionary has made the choice
for themselves, arriving there because of their use of reason and their experience. As
Henry states it, "I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of
experience." (Henry 102). He goes on and argues, using logical appeal, the case for
declaring independence from Britain. Although, today most people see democracy as a
very effective form of government in colonial America, it was against all accepted
political philosophies of the time. Henry pays no regards to the laws and customs of his
time, yet today we see him as a hero who fought for freedom. Henry's speech supports
Emerson's individualism because it places the power of reason and experience against the
forces of the law and the standard monarchies of the time.
Just like Emerson; the other major transcendentalist, Thoreau, places the authority
of morality on the individual in "Civil Disobedience". Thoreau expresses this view even
more strongly and confidently with the bold statement "That government is best which
governs not at all" (Thoreau 249). He argues that government is of no real value for
society and only acts as "a sort of wooden gun that people hold to themselves" (Thoreau
250). Government is only seen as the opposition to an individual because in Thoreau's
mind, people are perfectly
...
...