Marijuana Banished

Marijuana Banished

Why?

Marijuana is illegal. Illegal to possess, purchase, distribute or grow. To start off the basic non-creative, non-read between the lines question; Why? Why was marijuana made illegal that fateful day 68 years ago. Is there a justifiable reason to the original criminalization and continuation of that law to present day? So, again I ask; Why? Yet, besides the reason why marijuana is illegal many are against the prohibition laws. However, possibly just as many are for keeping marijuana in the same position it has stood for 68 years. Prohibitionists' only non defensive argument is that marijuana is a gateway drug. Those in favor of marijuana legalization claim it has a medicinal value and is no worse than alcohol or cigarettes, in their own separate ways. Prohibitionists tend to disagree. Lastly, it seems the system is broken. The way the laws are set up really doesn't work very effectively, or maybe the focus is on the wrong part of this situation or the ways to eliminate the "problem" are being carried out in the wrong manor. Either way, whether marijuana is decriminalized or not some changes need to be made to the current system.

After a series of events the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 banned marijuana but it created consequences that were not expected. Prior to the congressional meeting, at which marijuana would be banned, lies and propaganda had been flying about amongst the people. Only years after alcohol prohibition ended the liquor industry, obviously seeing marijuana as a major threat, released the movie Reefer Madness, depicting a man going insane from smoking marijuana, which leads him to murder his entire family. He obviously had some other serious issues. Seeing hemp as a major threat to the plastics industry and timber industry, each aided in promoting the movie and campaigning for marijuana prohibition. Since alcohol prohibition had ended in 1933 the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, now DEA, was losing money. This could be connected to their director, Harry Anslinger's strong interest in marijuana prohibition. He spoke before congress with circumstantial evidence and accusations that I hopefully would not fly today. "Most marijuana smokers are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing result from marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes." I would think today that this statement would be considered bad conduct but then again it isn't quite legal to have a partner of the same sex. It's a shame we haven't progressed that far, but that's a different sociology paper.

The hemp industry was actually at a point were it was ready to take off; it's a shame it would take a fatal turn. Hemp is said to have the potential to make roughly 25,000 different products. Few knew that banning marijuana would lead to the downfall of the exploding hemp industry. Therefore, the Marijuana Tax Act was based on a lack of knowledge amongst the people. Too bad the knowledge they did possess was lies. If they only knew what we know now. Perhaps the Tax Act may never have been passed or even proposed in the first place.

Unfortunately, what we do know now has never been certain, for either side of the fence. Is marijuana really a gateway drug? There is no way to prove that someone who uses marijuana is going to move on to harsher drugs. There are only statistics that suggest the possibility is increased. I question the logic in that idea. I find it hard to believe that if someone is interested in using drugs, for whatever reason, they would first go straight to injecting themselves or snorting and uncertain substance. It's only safe to assume that a person would start with a better understood, safer, less harsh, easier to acquire and administer drug to see if they enjoy its effects. This could possibly lead to them experimenting with other drugs in the future. That's why the statistics say what they do. There is evidence that suggests smoking marijuana WILL cause a person to experiment with other illicit drugs.

Those campaigning for the legalization of marijuana suggest that there is a medicinal value in marijuana. Unfortunately, for them there is no proof of this. The shred of hope they have is that THC, the key element in marijuana, is also available in prescription drugs but tends to not be prescribed because there are many other remedies which provide its therapeutic agents more effectively. Although without the medicinal proof needed many have said that marijuana does aid in multiple areas. Alleviating depression and anxiety, use as a sleeping aid or even as a sexual enhancer. Also, some use it in the same manor that one would have a glass of wine at the end of a stressful workday. In fact I believe marijuana tends to be used in more mature ways than that of alcohol. As in more smoke for the above reasons or to relax than those that drink in the appreciation of great liquor.

It seems nothing these days comes without a side effect, whatever it may be. So it's no surprise to say that marijuana is no exception. However, I would like to point out that marijuana in its pure form is less damaging than that which is available today; laced or even genetically altered. So... contaminated marijuana has 30 times more carcinogens than cigarettes and 50% more tar than tobacco. Flat out marijuana is worse for you than cigarettes but it's a personal choice no one is forcing anybody to use either. The only side note is that the comparison of how much marijuana smokers intake compared to the amount cigarette smokers intake, marijuana tends to be substantially less. Short term and long term effects from those who smoke both are generally from the cigarettes. Only a few cases have been reported