Meaning Of Chemical Castration

The Meaning of Chemical Castration

Many believe that castration is barbaric for the simple fact that their concerns against voluntary castration are based on misconceptions; whereas, others believe castration is acceptable due to the fact, women are given the right to abortion, not to mention, it is considered a cruel and unusual punishment. According to Laura Matthies, at this same site, counters: "Chemical castration is not an acceptable form of punishment for male sex offenders, however, many people argue that chemical castration is 'cruel and unusual punishment,' but others are more concerned with the ramifications of this kind of treatment (Laura Matthies).

The big question is, "What does it mean to those directly involved and how do they feel about the situation?" Like your favorite movie or television show, similarly, there is a great deal of people who play a role in the decision of castration, but only a few plays a major part. For instance, the sex offender, the victim, and the judge would be the individuals that are directly involved. On the other hand, the doctor, lawyers, the jury, the

BURNETT 2

victim's and sex offender's family, and etc. would be those indirectly involved.

In the first place, the sex offender would be the big shot who gets all the screen time due to their key involvement in the decision of undergoing castration, and notably they would be the one's most affected by the result. While chemical castration blunts the male sex drive, it also places the criminal at risk for other medical problems, including gallstones and diabetes. If the sex offender wishes to undergo the procedure of having his testicles removed, he will lose his sexual drive forever. For instance, if the sex offender is married and he and his wife have a lovely