Morally Wrong

Morally wrong?

There are many debates today between Science and ethics Opposing view. A big argument that is recently brought up from the opposing view is that, even creating embryos for stem cells to research is morally wrong. They, who support a ban on all types of human cloning do so believe that it is immoral because they believe that ultimately no good can come from the procedure.

There are only two uses for a cloned human embryo: To create a cloned human being, or to create human life in the lab in order to destroy it so cells can be harvested for other purposes. They see creating human life for the purpose of sacrificing it -- even for beneficial research -- is morally and ethically wrong.

They see as the same as why it's not permissible to harvest the organs of a dying human being to save the life of another. The involuntary harvesting of organs from a convicted murderer prior to execution? The states say this will never happen. The taking of vital organs from a consenting terminally ill patient? No doctor will touch it because the fear of immoral practice.

Some say that a human embryo is not entitled to the same protections as human baby. They fight in the fact of, then why does the federal law that imposes criminal and civil penalties for killing a bald eagle provides the same punishment for the destruction of its eggs? Because both acts result in the death of a bird the government believes is important to protect. Must human life be endangered to be afforded the same protection as animal life?

They also see no good reason for cloning embryos to produce "stem cells" for study. In fact, such research siphons off precious funding from more promising and fruitful research into the therapeutic uses of adult stem cells, which already exist.

Both sides of the debate on cloning agree on one point: Cloning for the purpose of producing a viable cloned human