Omega Paw
Essay by tchrisantha • September 26, 2017 • Essay • 1,781 Words (8 Pages) • 1,066 Views
Executive Summary
Omega Paw has tapped into the North American Market with a Unique Self Cleaning Litter box for cats. The litter box has received positive reviews and has been accepted by major distributors. With a steady line of weekly production and availability of a significant Financial Budget the company is looking forward avenues to increase its sales and profits.
Problem Statement
With the presence of Direct & Indirect competition and there been no barriers for future competition as well Omega Paw has to plan and implement Marketing & Distribution channel to increase presence and sales.
Situational Analysis
Objective/Goals
After being in business for just over a year and reaching impressive Sales and hoping to continue the favourable trend Omega Paw is aspiring to reach $1.7M Sales in 2012, $3M in 2013 & $5.7M in 2014 and contemplating what changes are required for the existing strategy to achieve the aggressive growth planned.
Background/Normal Forecast
The company started out with directly shipping to customers on pre-orders received advertisements in Magazines and TV Commercials. There were dents in the reputation of the company due to Production problems with initial mould causing delays in meeting pre order sales and supplying not yet perfected litter boxes through the distributors in Canada.
SWOT
Strengths
- Compared with 3 major competitors Omega Paw litter box is simple and user friendly.
- Proved to be the only Self-Cleaning Litter Box in the US Market in 2011 and seven of the eight distributors whom were contacted picked up the product right away.
- Readily available marketing budget of $100,000
- Manufacturing capacity of 3500 units per week.
Weaknesses
- Dent in the reputation with the Canadian Distribution for selling not yet perfected products.
- Not keeping up to the Delivery time for pre-sold products.
- Lacking of experience of the Management at Omega Paw.
Market Analysis
There are estimated to be 84.2million cats in North America (74M in United States & 10.2M in Canada). The Cat population has risen by 7% between 2010 & 2012 and estimated to grow at an annual rate of 3.6 for the next few years. The growth is mainly due to the Condo type living, ageing population and the ease of care and maintenance for cats relative to other pets.
Market Segmentation
Omega Paw has divided the Cat owners to three main consumer groups,
- New Pet Owners which is 5%, who will need all applicable pet care & products ,
- Existing Cat Owners which they assume to be 80% and who well care for their pets and stock with traditional cat care and maintenance supplies
- 15% labeled as "gray zone", where the owners lived mostly in the country and Cats are one of many pets they own. and who will not purchasing only cat food.
Competitive Analysis
The company has three direct Competitors
- "Ever clean Self Scoop Litter Box" by First Brands Corporation,, The products are priced between $53-$63 and spends lots of money on advertising to pet stores via trade magazines and has a North America wide distribution.
- "Quick Sand" marketed by Smart Inventions- Product is priced at $29 which is very competitive and where the acquirer of the company spent around $200k-$300k weekly for 6 months on advertising and gained exposure in Canada & United States.
- "Lift & Sift" which is marketing through Wal-Mart. Product is priced at $27but does not have much advertising exposure.
Omega Paw has a competitive advantage due to the simplicity of the Omega Paw Product and with proper marketing and distribution, it could capture a larger market share.
It also has Indirect competition and there are no barriers to New entrants to the market in the future.
Financial Analysis
With the current Selling price of $18 and Total Variable Cost of $8.88 and weekly production of 3500units and a Marketing Budget of $100k Omega Paw is considering four distribution channels which involved additional Variable & Fixed Costs as follows.
| Existing Advertising | Mail Order | Mass Distribution | Grocery Stores |
Weekly Sales | 3500 | 3500 | 3500 | 3500 |
Selling price (MSP) | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 | 18.00 |
Mark Up-Variable |
|
| 7.20 | 15.51 |
|
|
|
| 3.00 |
| 18.00 | 18.00 | 25.20 | 36.51 |
| 63,000 | 63,000 | 88,200 | 127,785 |
Variable Cost |
|
|
|
|
Production | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
Shipping | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
Packaging | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.38 |
| 8.88 | 8.88 | 8.88 | 8.88 |
Mark Up Cost |
|
| 7.20 | 15.51 |
| 8.88 | 8.88 | 16.08 | 24.39 |
Variable Cost | 31,080 | 31,080 | 56,280 | 85,365 |
Margin | 31,920 | 31,920 | 31,920 | 42,420 |
Fixed Cost | 1,000 | 10,000 | 50,000 | 10,500 |
Profit | 30,920 | 21,920 | -18,080 | 31,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
Margin Per Unit | 9.12 | 9.12 | 9.12 | 12.12 |
Break Even Units | 110 | 1,096 | 5,482 | 866 |
...
...