Essays24.com - Term Papers and Free Essays
Search

Ops/571 Week 1 Process Desing Matrix

Essay by   •  June 26, 2016  •  Term Paper  •  1,129 Words (5 Pages)  •  1,065 Views

Essay Preview: Ops/571 Week 1 Process Desing Matrix

Report this essay
Page 1 of 5

Process Desing Matrix

Fatima Qazi

April 04, 2016

University of Phoenix

Professor Wayne Moore

OPS/571


Process Design Matrix and Summary

        The primary approaches for delivering services includes: the production-line approach, self-service approach, and the personal-attention approach (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). In order to produce a successful product, fims must consider the correct format and structure (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). In this brief the appropriate design approaches for fast food products and “Build a Bear” services will be identified in a process design matrix. (See Process Design Matrix)

Appropriate Design Approaches for Services

Fast food utilizes the production-line approach. This approach assumes that the food construction process is more like a manufacturing process rather than a service (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). Fast food companies apply a variety of manufacturing technologies and lean science concepts to their operations. As a result of this manufa ccturing approach, fast food companies are abel to deliver quality food that is standardized in preparation consistently.

Another approach to fast food service design is the self-service approach.  This approach refers to the customer acting more within the production processs such as preparing his or her own drinks or even allocating food from self sevice bars (Jacobs & Chase, 2011).  Buffets are an example of the self-service approach. This approach is useful and can be combined with different approaches in fast food such as having salad bars along with the production line approach making other products (Jacobs & Chase, 2011, p. 227).

Another approach is the personal-attention approach. This approach refers to providing the customer with a unique experience in order to entice the customer to repeat the experience. Fast food such as McDonalds utilizes a number of strategies in this area such as giving away toys to children, playgrounds inside of the stores, games for adults, etc. The personal-attention approach creates a method of developing a relationship with customers using these tactics (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). This service approach provides a means for encouraging customers to return to the store in order to relive the experience.

Appropriate Design Approaches for Products

In the approaches for products, a good company to study is “Build a Bear”.  This company consists of workshops which customers utilize to create their own stuffed toy bears using the supplies provided.  This is what is known as a job shop approach and it focuses on a particular part of operations (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). The job shop approach incorporates the workcenter or manufacturing area in to the daily operation (Mazzone, 2012). This creates a customer service area for working, building, and creating toys but eliminates the shipping and receiving function as well as the marketing for specific toys.  Once the bear has been personalized in fabrication in the store, the customer then pays for the bear.

Another approach is the assembly line approach which is also incorporated into the Build a Bear layout.  This product design works by allowing the customers to create certain aspects fo the product through a progressive set of steps in manufacturing (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). For instance, all materials such as buttons and small items for assembly will be on a line to choose during the initial planning stage of the bear. This method creates order and standardization to the process while reducing the cost of having large amounts of materials scattered throughout the store.

The continuous process is another design approach used for these products. This is a method that is similar to the assembly line but instead is utilized with only a few aspects of the production flow such as glueing small parts (Jacobs & Chase, 2011). By conscentrating on these aspects in a special process the entire production of bears is made faster because the customers are not all waiting to utilize the limited gluing process. This process reduces cost by performing the process limitedly on large numbers of the products.

Conclusion

In the examples of fast food and Build a Bear one can see that delivering services using the the production-line approach and the self-service approach can make companies more cost effective and increase the customer satisfaction.  These approaches are also flexible in many instances allowing for the incorporation of other approaches such as the personal-attention approach and workcenter layout.  By using these approaches approapriately, both types of companies are able to reduce cost and create a more effective operations that is both satisfying and consistent for the customer experience.


References

Build A Beear. (2016). Build a Bear Shoppin. Retrieved from         http://www.buildabear.com/shopping/search/Outfits/d/?q=Star%20Wars

Jacobs, F. R. & Chase, R. (2011). Operations and Supply Chain Management (13th ed.). Boston,

        MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.


Process Design Matrix

Process Design Aspect

Service (Fast Food)

Product (Buidl a Bear)

Design focal point

Standard quality of food and customer experience.

Personalized toys and unique customer experience.

Strategy

Standardization allows for reproducible results and better expansion.

Standardization allows for reproducible results and better expansion.

Process design approach

The production-line approach

A job-shop/workcenter approach

Process map

  • Place order for food items  
  • order is prepared through system of assembly of ingredients
  • order is packaged
  • order is given to customer
  • Materials for building bear are provided in workshop
  • Machines such as gluing or heating elements are setup using production quotas
  • Custoemrs work to build bears
  • When complete customers pay for bears.  

Process Performance Measurement

Customers provide feedback through surveys and their orders are monitored for speed and efficiency i.e. time in drive through.

Customer feedback, sales ROI.

Factory location

In store- Operations can be placed in many different areas but must be large populations.

In store- Operations can be placed in many different areas but must be large populations.

Facilty layout

The facility must accommodate the customers’ physical and psychological needs and expectations (Jacobs & Chase, 2011).

The facility must accommodate customers’ physical and psychological needs but must maintain safety (Jacobs & Chase, 2011).

Process design

Process must follow standards for cleanliness, quality, and and safety.

Process must follow standards for cleanliness, quality, and and safety.

Scheduling

System must work with lack of scheduling.

System must work with lack of scheduling.

Producting planning

Production must work in an on demand scenario.

Production must work in an on demand scenario.

Workforce

The workforce must be part of the process and adhere to standards that create consistency in behavior and product making.

The workforce must be part of the process and adhere to standards that create consistency in behavior and product making.

Quality

Quality standards are measurable and fixed including high-quality fresh food, cleanliness, and customer service.

Quality standards are flexible because customers create products.

Capacity

Capacity is vital to serving the largest number of customers in the most effective means.

Store size dictates capacity.

Inventory

Seasonal, weekly, and holiday fluctuations need to be accounted for in the inventory process.

Inventory can be stocked for long terms due to lack of spoilage.

...

...

Download as:   txt (7.6 Kb)   pdf (164.3 Kb)   docx (9.9 Kb)  
Continue for 4 more pages »
Only available on Essays24.com