Post Study

Possible future studies:

Since the paper didn't introduce any detailed way on how the models were constructed and formulated, it is hard to construct a brain new study on the limitation of givened pedagogical knowledge of these models. However, I did thought of two ideas for possible extension on this study for future references.

First, in the future studies, since both models have shown potential to provide important insights into the links between the cognitive domains of verbal working memory and language processing, we should formulate a conjunction between two model with recognition on more interpretation from other possible studies/models. Since Baddley's model has been successfully accounts for a

First, USING NANO IMPLANTS TO MONITORING BRAINÐŽ¦S ELECTRONIC SIGNALS AND ACTION POTENTIALS

Through out the paper, one canÐŽ¦t help thinking about a simple fact: All the models introduced in the paper are based physical studies on test subjects, none of them goes as far as monitoring the brainÐŽ¦s electronic signals. It is well know that neural system works by generating and transmission of action potentials, which can be treated as impulse responses of a modern LTI( linear time invariant) system. linear system can be modeled with simple mathematical program, such as matlab. Practical models for LTI system have been already established. Modern processing technologies have been advanced enough to make complex MEMS( micro electronic mechanical system) devices of sub micron level dimension a reality, sensors using such technologies are well capable of picking up signals as small as a few micro volts. Therefore, nano sensors implants can provide sound scientific supports for the models claimed. One can actually determine which part of brain is more active then the other during processing with such devices, and therefore more scientifically