Tartuffe
Essay by 24 • December 5, 2010 • 930 Words (4 Pages) • 1,194 Views
The comedy Tartuffe, written by Jean-Babtiste Moliere, is undoubtedly a satire; the question is what is the poem a satire of: the Catholic religion itself, or the hypocrites within the Church and their corruption? I believe the latter to be the focus of Moliere's commentary.
It is apparent throughout Tartuffe that Moliere has an admiration for religion, as practiced by genuinely pious and humble individuals. Cleante is a character who personifies rationality throughout the play. His character becomes the active voice and is used by Molier as an instrument to express his own ideas and to present several of the comedy's themes. In Act I, Cleante shares his views with Orgon, who is being fooled by the hypocrisy of Tartuffe, saying, "There is nothing I more revere than a soul whose faith is steadfast and sincere, nothing that I more cherish and admire than honest zeal and true religious fire" (p. 322). In this speech, Moliere's respect for religion is evident. Moliere believed in the value of sincere devoutness. While he felt that hypocrisy and corruption did exist in the Church, he did not advocate the abandonment of faith and religion. This contention is a primary theme in Tartuffe.
Moliere's comedy disapproves of those who worship merely for show. In referring to hypocrites, and more specifically Tartuffe, Cleante proclaims, "So there is nothing that I find more base than specious piety's dishonest face- than these bold mountebanks, these histrios whose impious mummeries and hollow shows exploit our love of Heaven" (p.322). From statements such as this, it is evident that Moliere's intent for this play was to satirize hypocrites within the church. However, church officials damned Tartuffe as "a play which offends piety" filled with "abominations from beginning to end" (p. 306)? When King Louis XIV asked why so much commotion was being made by the Catholic Church over Tartuffe, his prince replied "It is because the comedy of... Moliere makes fun of them, and that is what they cannot bear." It is noteworthy that Moiere's play criticizing the actions of hypocritical Church members would offend the Church leadership.
Outward appearances were of paramount importance to these individuals, and as a result, they were most eager have the play banned so that no one would see their character called into question. In defending his comedy against its many critics, Moliere wrote, "the function of comedy is to correct men's vices... The most forceful lines of a serious moral statement are usually less powerful than those of satire; and nothing will reform most men better than the depiction of their faults" (p.308). The leaders of the Catholic Church claimed the play was a mockery of their institution and leaders, instead of a commentary on hypocritical Church members and their negative effects on the Church's reputation and pious followers.
Moliere believed that such hypocrites were a cancerous threat to the integrity of the Church. Moliere once said, "There is nothing so innocent that men cannot turn it to crime; nothing so beneficial that its values cannot be reversed; nothing so good in itself that it cannot be put to bad use...Even the holiest of things are not immune from human corruption and every day we see scoundrels who use
...
...