The Ownership Of Time Warner

In 50’s, there are over 500 media companies in America, but through many integrations, there are only 6 major media institutions in America and they dominate nearly 98% of the market in America. “The media monopoly” written by Ben Bagdikian in 1983 criticized that the concentration of the media institution in America is fundamentally anti-democratic.

Moreover, In the process of globalisation, people of different countries are becoming “world audiences”. The demands for media texts produced by these 6 media institutions are increasing. For example, In Hong Kong, most of the foreign films shown in cinema are produced from Hollywood. And the programmes of the popular paid-TV channels are bought from these 6 major media institution such as HBO, ESPN and National geographic. It is the fact that this trend will make these media institutions becomes richer and more powerful.

In order to study on this issue, the Time Warner Inc. (Time Warner) is selected to study how influence the consumers and even the world. Selecting Time Warner is because it is the largest media institutions in the world. It is a well-developed corporation so in-depth studies can be undergone.

Time Warner is an American media corporation which is the merger between Time Inc. and Warner Communications (1990); subsequently purchased by AOL (2001). Today, it is the largest media institution in the world. It had revenues of 43.7 billion USD in 2005. From figure 1, Time Warner is divided into many business segments in which the major businesses are film productions, television divisions, publishing, telecommunications and Internet. The media products include films, TV programmes, newspapers, magazines and movie discs etc.

The development of Time Warner involves mainly 2 kinds of integration - Horizontal integration and vertical integration вЂ" which is 2 types of ownership concentration in an industry.

Horizontal integration involves obtaining competitors in the same section of the industry. For example, Business 2.0, a popular monthly newsstand magazine which is originally owned by “Imagine Media”, was sold to Time Inc. of Time Warner in July, 2001. In this case, Time Warner may continue to increase its occupation in the magazine market. When the corporation occupy larger enough of the market, it enhances the promotion of the new release products, e.g. films, and likely to dominate the decision making process of consumers.

The importance of horizontal integration is that the company has a better control of the market. Besides, it can achieve a better economic of scale so as to raise its competing power.

Vertical integration involves acquiring every stage of the production process. Hence, the company can ensure a complete control of a product. From the above, it is mentioned that Time Warner has many companies in different stages of the productions. These companies would not work separately. Instead, they are well-coordinated in order to maximize revenues and growth worldwide.

In Time Warner, movie studios like Warner Bros, CastleRock Entertainment and New Line Cinema etc. of Time Warner producing many films every year. And Cinamerica, a movie theater of Time Warner, ensure the space and time for distributing the films in America. After the films had been shown in cinemas, Time Warner can put their film on their TV channels such as HBO and CNN. Finally, Time Warner has production companies such as Picturehouse to release VCDs and DVDs of the films. Besides, the TV, newspapers, magazines and books of Time Warner can help to promote the films of Time Warner, such as interviewing the artists, before the release of the films.

In fact, vertical integration is very important because the company can control its distribution and dominate its position by limiting the access for other competitors. Therefore, potential profits of the company can be maximized.

With horizontal integration and vertical integration, the media products “can therefore be sold, publicized and marketed to an audience through many different media”. In the case of Time Warner, blanket coverage is even possible.

From the above, it is shown that Time Warner is a very powerful media institution which holds all kind of media. It possibly has great influences in the local US. Firstly, Ben Bagdikian stated that an impressive picture of diversity that there are different kinds of publishing imprints in the market is created. Consumers seem to have many selections. But actually, consumers have limited choices only because many of them are owned by Time Warner and they may consist of similar ideologies of the institution. Consumers are possibly imbued with the ideologies of Time Warner.

Secondly, Bagdikian questioned the editorial independence because editors may be required to protect interests of the mother company. For example, a film produced by the studio of Time Warner is commented from the public in both positive and negative sides. the editor or even the executive of the magazines of the Time Warner would concern the interests of the Time Warner. Hence only the positive comments may be selected to inform but neglect the negative comments in order not to affect the box office. From the above case, the information informed to the public may not reflect the real case.

Finally, concentrated media ownership can create strong political influences. The owners of the media institution can also have direct control of over media products in order to create political influence by promoting ideas that enhance their interests. For example, Time magazine of Time Warner is a well-known magazine about current affairs in America. The standpoints in the Time magazine can affect the political ideas of the public. On the other hands, Bagdikian also stated that the central authority may take over information that media will be subject to political and financial