V.R.I.O. Analysis
Essay by 24 • May 1, 2011 • 1,154 Words (5 Pages) • 3,961 Views
A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS : VRIO
* Resource-based analysis of the firm determines which resources and capabilities result in which strengths or weaknesses
* Strategies are to be implemented which exploit (or build) strengths and avoid (or eliminate) weaknesses
* What constitutes a strength or weakness is partially a function of the external environment
* Framework for analysis: VRIO - resources and capabilities should be
o Valuable
o Rare
o Inimitable
o Organization can effectively exploit them
VALUE of resources and capabilities
* A VALUABLE resource or capability (or a combination thereof) must
o Contribute to fulfillment of customer's needs
o At a price the consumer is willing to pay, which is determined by
 Customer preferences
 Available alternatives (including substitute products)
 Supply of related or supplementary goods
* Thus, value is partially a function of external environment (product market, demand forces)
* Changes in consumer tastes, industry structure, technology, etc. can result in changed value
* Resources of different firms can be valuable in different ways (e.g., Timex versus Rolex)
* Value = Lowered costs or increased revenues or both
SCARCITY of resources and capabilities
* Resources and capabilities must be in short supply to create competitive advantage (and go beyond competitive parity)
* What would happen if this were not the case?
* An analysis of the firm's resources and capabilities must include critical assessment whether they are unusual when compared to those of competitors
* How rare does a resource have to be in order to have potential for generating a competitive advantage?
* Example of a rare resource: Wal-Mart's point-of-purchase inventory control system
* To be a source of sustained competitive advantage the rarity of the resource must persist over time
INIMITABILITY of resources dans capabilities
* Requirement for sustained competitive advantage
* Ease of imitation depends on
o Cost asymmetries ("Do firms without a resource or capability face a cost disadvantage in obtaining it compared to firms that already possess it?")
o Capabilities of competitors
* Sources of cost asymmetries / cost disadvantages fall into two categories :
o Impediments to imitation : Impede rivals from duplicating critical resources and capabilities
o Early-mover advantages : Set in motion a dynamic that increases the magnitude of that advantage relative to other firms over time
Impediments to imitation :
o Legal restrictions on imitation :
 Patents, copyrights, trademarks
 Governmental control over entry into markets (licensing, certification, quotas on operating rights)
o Superior access to inputs or to customers
o Market size and scale economies
o Intangible barriers to imitation
 Causal ambiguity
 Dependence on historical circumstances
 Other path dependencies
 Social complexity
Degrees of resource and capability imitability
Source: C. Montgomery, "Resources: The essence of Corporate Advantage", Harvard Business School Case N1-792-064.
* Cannot be imitated : Patents, unique assets, unique locations
* Difficult to imitate : Brand loyalty, employee satisfaction, reputation for fairness
* Can be imitated (but may not be) Capacity preemption, economies of scale
* Easy to imitate : Cash, commodities
ORGANIZING to exploit competitive potential of resources and capabilities
The following elements must be in place in order to effectively exploit the resource(s) and/or capability(s):
o Structure
o Management and control systems
o Compensation policies
o Business processes
o Complementary resources and capabilities
* Examples :
o Caterpillar : Global formal reporting structure, global inventory systems
o Wal-Mart: Inventory control system
o Xerox: Highly bureaucratic product development process - failed to exploit enormous opportunities (e.g., PC, mouse, windows-type software, laser printer, "paperless office", ethernet, etc.)
THE VRIO FRAMEWORK
Is a resource or a capability or a combination of resources & capabilities :
Valuable? Rare? Costly to Imitate ? Exploitable by the Organization? Competitive implications Economic performance Strengths or Weaknesses
No - - No Competitive Disadvantage Below normal Weakness
Yes No - to Competitive Parity Normal Strength
Yes Yes No Temporary competitive advantage Above normal Strength and distinctive competence
...
...