What Role Might Fictional Embellishments Have On The Interpretations Of Religious Doctrines?

What role might fictional embellishments have on the interpretations of religious doctrines?

Fictional embellishments have played a huge role on religious doctrines such as the Holy Bible. This book is taken literally to many, yet other people stop their acceptance of the stories in the Holy Bible and question it. They question its purpose and what might be the true meaning instead of what society thinks it's conveying. Some people are out to prove that both the Holy Bible and religion such as Christianity are nothing but ancient conspiracies. Fictional embellishments such The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown and the many different stories of Magdalene have changed the interpretations of religious doctrines by adding a different theory towards religion.

Many texts today question and that some stories in the bible weren't part of the original bible. Some stories weren't part of the Old Testament but were added to the New Testament. The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown argues that, "Jesus was married... and suggests that Christ had a sex life". Theories such as this are a prime example of how fictional embellishments can play a huge role on the interpretation of a religious doctrine such as the bible because this theory can persuade people that either what they worshiped was a whole lie or start cotrovertory over trying to bash or insult a particular religion.

A with fictional embellishments such as The Da Vinci Code is that they can provide another answer to the question of is their really a supreme being? or if the Bible is just a fictional story? The debate of whether if one is true our not causes fear amongst man. Nobody knows if a heaven or hell exists or if it doesn't where afterlife is for man. What valid explanation is there for the supernatural things that occur on our planet? As people we naturally fear what we don't understand. The Bible could be fictional stories to answer the questions society once had of the unexplained or it could be the truth it's portrayed as. A truth which societies since the time the Bible was written misinterpreted. Now there are so many, "bible literalists around, they fuss about what the scripture actually says".(142, Acocella) This should have been done long ago but society then won't dare question religion like society of the twenty first century does so frequently. What's puzzling about the ancient societies is their quick acceptance of the Bible and its religion. What made these people just believe that this