Double Pendulum -Estimating Tilt Angle of the Second Link Using Multiple Accelerometers
Essay by meghanlea • December 6, 2017 • Lab Report • 580 Words (3 Pages) • 1,023 Views
Essay Preview: Double Pendulum -Estimating Tilt Angle of the Second Link Using Multiple Accelerometers
MECH496 Lab 3: Double Pendulum -Estimating Tilt Angle of the Second Link
Using Multiple Accelerometers
November.7/2017
Meghan Lea
10130156
Results, Discussion and Conclusion
Below are the calculated values for gain and bias for both potentiometers and accelerometers in the x and y directions. These values were used to calculate the accelerations and tilt angles.
Table 1: Values of gain and bias for potentiometer 1 and 2 and both accelerometers in x and y
| Gain | Bias |
Pot 1 | 71.42857143 | 2.55 V |
Pot 2 | 67.1641791 | 2.09 V |
acc1x | 28.85294118 | 1.6 V |
acc1y | 29.72727273 | 1.6 V |
acc2x | 28.85294118 | 1.64 V |
acc2y | 28.02857143 | 1.6 V |
The following plot shows tilt angle of the lower pendulum estimated from the accelerometer using equations 7-10 from the lab manual and the potentiometer measured angle (Eq.13).
[pic 1]
Figure 1: Section of Potentiometer vs Accelerometer reading
[pic 2]
Figure 2 Potentiometer vs Accelerometer reading
The following plot is the tilt angle of the lower pendulum estimated from the accelerometers (Eqs.11-12) and the potentiometer measured angle (Eq. 13)
[pic 3]
Figure 3: Section of Potentiometer vs Accelerometer readings for the second method
[pic 4]
Figure 4 Potentiometer vs Accelerometer reading for method 2
The following plot shows the error propagation of the length measurement with adding 10% to the original length. The error is measured by taking the difference of the 2 measurements and comparing. For L; we saw a minimum error of -8.8°, a maximum value of 2.9° and a average error of -0.43°. There for the range of this plot is ±5.9°.
[pic 5]
Figure 5 Error propagation for adding 10% to length L
[pic 6]
Figure 6: Section of Error propagation with 10% added to length
The following plot shows the error propagation of the length measurement with adding 10% to the length L1. The error is measured by taking the difference of the 2 measurements and comparing. For L1; we saw a minimum error of -11°, a maximum value of 0.29° and a average error of -0.98°. There for the range of this plot is ±5.6°.
[pic 7]
Figure 7 Error propagation with 10% added to length L1
[pic 8]
Figure 8: Section of Error propagation with 10% added to length L1
...
...